🔗 Share this article

The Four Spent the Day Together centers on protagonists pursuing new beginnings, trying to break free from drugs or abusive marriages, only to witness hope devolve into violence. The author frequently uses the phrase "fresh start", making it deliberately jaded through recurring use. Phrases such as "He could make a fresh start" and "They opted for a clean break" are scattered across the text. At the same time, Kraus herself is embarking on her personal new beginning, as this appears a different type of work – observational, authentically narrative. Yet it proves to be filled with the same dilemmas and styles as her previous works.

From Accidental Writer to Renowned Book

Chris Kraus was originally an visual artist who transitioned to writing unintentionally with her 1997 groundbreaking book I Love Dick, structured as epistles to an unresponsive love interest, elevating intimate women's literature from humiliation into rebellion. She persisted as a writer, but the following three engaging and challenging novels did not possess the power and directness that the letter form infused into the voice of I Love Dick. It didn't help was her identity as a maverick maker who had evolved into a extensive real estate holder, so there was considerable focus on housing investments. It follows that she currently desires to explore fresh narrative sources, directing her gaze to external narratives, at a period in which she claims that contemporary political climate turns intimate literature obsolete.

Three Generations, Collective Unavoidable Background

The Four Spent the Day Together is structured in three parts, encompassing three generations – each trapped by their backgrounds. There is the narrative about a couple named Emma and Jasper, based on her own mother and father, transitioning from the Bronx to the Connecticut countryside. Then there is the story of Kraus herself, in the guise of a figure named Catt Greene, confronting the belated success of I Love Dick, the rise of Trump, and her partner struggling with addiction Paul. The third thread involves the narrative of a homicide of one troubled youth by another in a community mostly forsaken by liberal ideals only a brief drive from the protagonist's home in the Minnesota countryside.

For this reader drawn to honed writing of the sort Kraus herself typically rejects, I was seduced by the narrative style of the opening part.

As someone who reads who favors crafted language of the variety that Kraus herself usually avoids, I was seduced by the literary tone of the first section. There is a novel degree of detail that allows space for trivial aspects, like the container that the youthful Catt frees from the ice at the opening of the book, aided by her adored dad. "Look, an ice toy!" she declares; "a lovely toy", he answers, "the elliptical meanings of words rolling around in their mouths like sweet treats". Kraus writes the tale of Emma with inquiry and familiarity. "Emma felt like she'd stepped into a dream – not entirely her own."

Frustration and Disruption

I was fated to feel let down when I expected this different style could last out the book. The author states here that she is annoyed by the enjoyment readers like me have derived from I Love Dick; she's dedicated to fragmentation, to the messy artistic approach she shares with her idol author Kathy Acker, and the emptiness and redundancy of her previous novels returns in the middle section. Catt is trying to renovate 36 run-down apartments in Albuquerque's worst neighbourhoods while moving between two different states, unsuccessful in assisting Paul manage his alcohol use. She experiences powerlessness as her spouse cycles through underfunded jobs as an recovery specialist in a environment driven by the rage and anxiety that drives an electoral success. There are several pages about the protagonist facing cancellation on social media, her listed profession modified from "writer" to "real estate holder" on the online encyclopedia. She still gives the impression to be overly concerned about this. At one point she remarks that she's investigating the murder so that before departing the state, "she may grasp something about an America that her Twitter detractors would be unable to grasp, would not even perceive".

The Killing Story

Then we reach to the actual killing – and the referenced day experienced by the murdered individual with the killer and his companions. Kraus utilizes compelling foundational content, and details moment by moment what transpired when Brandon came to meet Brittney after meeting her on an app where she marketed explicit images. He anticipated intimacy but seems amiably to have occupied the day alongside her friends, wandering about getting his car mended and funding treats and narcotics, before being shot by Brittney's partner a man named Micah – a young, mentally ill man who has repeatedly received inpatient care for fits of anger.

Fascination and Incompletion

Catt develops an obsession by the story, and I was fascinated by the way that her twin drives towards responsible documentation and reckless transgression wrestle in this part. Yet I wished her to delve deeper into her personal fixations here. The compelling persona is the character Brittney, who gains dimension partly through the protagonist's connection to her – another bright, bullied girl derailing in a difficult, overlooked locality. Kraus notes that the protagonist communicates with Brittney in jail, but she doesn't dramatise these conversations. The whole section feels oddly unfinished, to the degree that the author's storytelling ends almost mid-par