Families' Anguish Over Shoreline Erosion Endangering Norfolk Burial Sites
Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.
An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards
The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.
A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for the community to determine how to proceed.
“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Troubled by the Past
A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril
Further up the coast lies the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.
“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”
In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Searching for Solutions and Clarity
The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.
Several families want additional sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.
“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”
A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”
It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.